<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What, no Britney story in EW this week?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2008/12/15/what-no-britney-story-in-ew-this-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2008/12/15/what-no-britney-story-in-ew-this-week/</link>
	<description>Movie reviews from award-winning journalist Christian Toto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cftoto</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2008/12/15/what-no-britney-story-in-ew-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-17220</link>
		<dc:creator>cftoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=1112#comment-17220</guid>
		<description>Rolling Stone is unreadable now if you&#039;ve ever even considered pulling the lever for a Republican candidate. What a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rolling Stone is unreadable now if you&#8217;ve ever even considered pulling the lever for a Republican candidate. What a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink in Cali</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2008/12/15/what-no-britney-story-in-ew-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-17219</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink in Cali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=1112#comment-17219</guid>
		<description>I think you are right that EW is having a decline it quality, although I did not realize that it was specifically happening.  When I used to get the magazine, I would take the first free hour  or two I had to read it, even if dinner was a little late or I had to stay up late to do it.  Now, I can wait several days or not even read it at all.  I figured I was just busier, but upon further reflection, I think you guys are right.  It is just not as good.  Too bad, it was one of the best parts of my week.  

Vanity Fair is another one I used to enjoy - it is now, however, the ultimate stop for BDS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right that EW is having a decline it quality, although I did not realize that it was specifically happening.  When I used to get the magazine, I would take the first free hour  or two I had to read it, even if dinner was a little late or I had to stay up late to do it.  Now, I can wait several days or not even read it at all.  I figured I was just busier, but upon further reflection, I think you guys are right.  It is just not as good.  Too bad, it was one of the best parts of my week.  </p>
<p>Vanity Fair is another one I used to enjoy &#8211; it is now, however, the ultimate stop for BDS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cftoto</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2008/12/15/what-no-britney-story-in-ew-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-17208</link>
		<dc:creator>cftoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=1112#comment-17208</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been able to swallow its anti-Bush bias ... maybe because each issue I know it&#039;s coming, or it&#039;s due to my affection for the mag in toto. But it&#039;s clearly there ... no different than nearly every other mag (even Men&#039;s Health -- which put Obama on the cover just as we were heading to the polls ...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been able to swallow its anti-Bush bias &#8230; maybe because each issue I know it&#8217;s coming, or it&#8217;s due to my affection for the mag in toto. But it&#8217;s clearly there &#8230; no different than nearly every other mag (even Men&#8217;s Health &#8212; which put Obama on the cover just as we were heading to the polls &#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lakely</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2008/12/15/what-no-britney-story-in-ew-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-17207</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lakely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=1112#comment-17207</guid>
		<description>What a shame it has been to watch a once vital-reading (and fun-reading) magazine spiral downward. And it&#039;s not just because of its one-note obsession with the likes of Britney and Twilight. EW, like every magazine in the last 8 years, has simply been unable to shake Bush Derangement Syndrome, with lefty politics openly infecting the pages. My wife and I gave up on it years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shame it has been to watch a once vital-reading (and fun-reading) magazine spiral downward. And it&#8217;s not just because of its one-note obsession with the likes of Britney and Twilight. EW, like every magazine in the last 8 years, has simply been unable to shake Bush Derangement Syndrome, with lefty politics openly infecting the pages. My wife and I gave up on it years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cftoto</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2008/12/15/what-no-britney-story-in-ew-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-17203</link>
		<dc:creator>cftoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=1112#comment-17203</guid>
		<description>Great point, something that was on my mind but slipped away as I wrote that post. The funny thing is ... I don&#039;t think your average EW reader is a starry eyed 13-year-old girl ... so why bend over backwards to reach out to them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point, something that was on my mind but slipped away as I wrote that post. The funny thing is &#8230; I don&#8217;t think your average EW reader is a starry eyed 13-year-old girl &#8230; so why bend over backwards to reach out to them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Bendor</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2008/12/15/what-no-britney-story-in-ew-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-17202</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Bendor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=1112#comment-17202</guid>
		<description>I thought EW is now known for, &quot;All Twilight, all the time&quot;; it might as well be their slogan...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought EW is now known for, &#8220;All Twilight, all the time&#8221;; it might as well be their slogan&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

