‘The Invention of Lying’ – Where’s Jim Carrey when you need him?

‘The Invention of Lying’ – Where’s Jim Carrey when you need him?

October 2, 2009

The Invention of Lying

What’s Ricky Gervais doing in a Jim Carrey comedy?

The film’s trailer won’t tell you, but Gervais’s “The Invention of Lying” is a full on assault against religion.

Guess “Bruce Almighty” himself might have objected to such a project.

“Lying,” stuffed with star cameos and wild flurries against spirituality, starts out sprightly but never fully recovers once its true intentions reveal themselves.

You know, mocking the Man Upstairs and other such fairy tales.

“Lying” begins with Gervais explaining the new reality presented before us. No one in this alternate universe is capable of telling anything but the cold, hard truth.

That means everyone says what they really feel – even if it hurts people’s feelings.

That comic gimmick works gangbusters when a portly loser named Mark (Gervais) goes on a blind date with Anna (Jennifer Garner), a stunner way out of his league.

The date is priceless. Each can’t help saying what’s actually on his or her mind, leading to a series of cutting, cruel remarks. Funny stuff, but it hardly sets Anna up as an ideal romantic heroine.

One day, Mark’s synapses begin firing in a new, remarkable way. Suddenly, he’s able to tell a lie whenever he pleases. He uses his new gift to make himself rich and, later, to comfort a dying loved one by telling her there’s a place like Heaven waiting for her when she passes.

Voila, Mark is a new age prophet, the man who speaks for the Man in the Sky with all the wisdom the Creator possesses.

One element of “Lying” is crystal clear. Gervais, an athiest off screen, co-wrote “Lying” to eviscerate organized religion. And Christianity to be specific.

You didn’t think he’d tackle Islam or Buddhism, did you?

In case you aren’t 100 percent sure where Gervais is aiming, he pops up later in full beard and flowing locks like a portly Jesus Christ. As sight gags go, it’s not bad, but the heavy handedness of the moment blunts his occasionally sharp assaults.

Organized religion has been around forever, so surely it can withstand the onslaught of Gervais’ overhyped wit.

But other aspects of the film are more curious – and confusing.

The characters, particularly Anna, obsess over finding the right genetic match, and Mark simply won’t do with his pudgy frame and pushed-up nose.

Is Gervais mocking our shallow culture? That’s the kind of low-hanging fruit seemingly beneath him. Perhaps the film is mocking natural selection, but if so it’s savaging both religion and science, leaving … who knows what?

Garner nearly makes the love story in the film palatable. She’s lovely but doe eyed innocent, nailing every comic moment that comes her way.

She’s a rom-com stealth weapon, still waiting for the great vehicle to prove it to the masses – consider “13 Going on 30″ only a nice start toward that end.

Gervais remains an alienating on-screen premise. You almost wish he would go all in, or use his sly humor to make himself more conventionally appealing. When he straddles the line as he does here and with “Ghost Town,” it’s uncomfortable to behold.

Carrey’s gimmick comedies rarely give us food for thought, but “The Invention of Lying” can’t help but spark debate. Too bad the spark flickers out long before the pat romantic resolution.

(Photo: Jennifer Garner and Ricky Gervais star in Warner Bros. Pictures’, Radar Pictures’ and Media Rights Capital’s romantic comedy “The Invention of Lying,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo by Sam Urdank)

Bookmark and Share

Related posts:

  1. ‘Lying’ trailer misdirects, ‘Citizen’s’ right on target
  2. ‘Valentine’s Day’ starring … everyone
  3. ‘Ghosts of Girlfriends Past’ – Dickens haunts rom-com
  4. Blu-ray review: ‘Elektra: The Director’s Cut’
  5. ‘Valentine’s Day’ – Too many stars stifle the urge for romance

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

JimmyC October 2, 2009 at 7:11 pm

Notice how the film’s trailers and other advertising make no mention of the anti-religion theme in the movie. Gee, I wonder why?

JimmyC October 2, 2009 at 7:16 pm

Sorry about the previous comment, Christian- if I had just scrolled down on the site I would have noticed that you recently posted on that very topic. But that would have been too much work for me. :-)

Heidi October 3, 2009 at 5:48 pm

Let’s face it Christian, you don’t like Gervais!

I do. I think he’s bril.

So he points out some of the craziness of blind faith – so? He’s making a movie in a Christian society, why would he choose to focus on Buddhism or Islam?

When you break down the Bible stories they are pretty implausible, and a little funny (if you think about it), but I don’t want to get into an argument over Christianity – I had my fill of that in Christian private school. :-)

Yes, I was highly irritated by the product placement, but it seems everyone is doing it these days.

The movie isn’t a home run, but I thought it was entertaining. I think viewers either get Gervais or don’t get Gervais. It’s something to do with that dry British sense of humor.

I think he made some pretty interesting observations without ramming it down our throats. In the end, the viewer can make their own decision as to whether the movie is a message film or simply pointing out some of the far out stuff people choose to believe and in fact, base their entire lives on.

I could go on, but I will conclude. I liked it and that ain’t no lie.

jic October 4, 2009 at 2:38 am

The movie isn’t a home run, but I thought it was entertaining. I think viewers either get Gervais or don’t get Gervais. It’s something to do with that dry British sense of humor.

It’s not hard to find Brits who think this movie sucks. Note that both reviews imply that Stephen Merchant was largely responsible for Gervais’ reputation as a comic genius. Well, actually, one basically says it outright…

Adam Whyte February 1, 2010 at 6:16 pm

From Matt Robinson, co-director:

‘I think it’s so funny when people say, oh God, there’s so much product placement in the film. We didn’t get a penny.’

Wish people would actually research statements before they made them; loads of people have criticised the ‘product placement’ in this movie, but they just didn’t want to use fake products.

cftoto February 1, 2010 at 6:29 pm

Interesting, Adam … thanks for sending this along.

The pizza box moment in the film is jarring …. you could have used any standard pizza box and gotten the point across. Creatively speaking it would have been a wash.

Today’s movies are inundated with product placement, so it’s hard not to imagine this wasn’t more of the same. I’ll amend my review all the same in the interest of fairness.

M.Russell May 9, 2010 at 5:37 am

Best movie I have ever seen and the best way to spread the word… wake up peoples. They have been lying to you since the Council Of Nicea!!!!!

jic May 9, 2010 at 3:15 pm

Which Council Of Nicea? There were two several centuries apart.

Does that mean that you were fine with religion as practised before the Council(s) Of Nicea?

Leave a Comment