<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WWTW&#8217;s Top Ten Movies of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2009/12/18/wwtws-top-ten-movies-on-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2009/12/18/wwtws-top-ten-movies-on-2009/</link>
	<description>Movie reviews from award-winning journalist Christian Toto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronco</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2009/12/18/wwtws-top-ten-movies-on-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23758</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5334#comment-23758</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the list. I may be repeating myself here, but I can see how this years list must have been a tough call... and I can see how I never would have made it as a critic.  If a film features &quot;clunky dialogue and leaden ideological memes&quot; or is  &quot;merely engaging&quot; after 30 minutes, it ain&#039;t on my list and it isn&#039;t worth writing about.  There are so many other things to do (like developing a taste for inspiring or invigorating music, or assembling a really good audio/ DVD system, or taking great hikes and walks or writing better comedy bits or...)

Each years crappy non-achievements makes me feel that much older (thus the need for a hike!), mainly because there are so many older films to buy/ rent and watch (another never ending task: figure out why RedBox or DVDPlay cannot get enough copies of decent movies into their rotations. Time for iTunes?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the list. I may be repeating myself here, but I can see how this years list must have been a tough call&#8230; and I can see how I never would have made it as a critic.  If a film features &#8220;clunky dialogue and leaden ideological memes&#8221; or is  &#8220;merely engaging&#8221; after 30 minutes, it ain&#8217;t on my list and it isn&#8217;t worth writing about.  There are so many other things to do (like developing a taste for inspiring or invigorating music, or assembling a really good audio/ DVD system, or taking great hikes and walks or writing better comedy bits or&#8230;)</p>
<p>Each years crappy non-achievements makes me feel that much older (thus the need for a hike!), mainly because there are so many older films to buy/ rent and watch (another never ending task: figure out why RedBox or DVDPlay cannot get enough copies of decent movies into their rotations. Time for iTunes?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Marlow</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2009/12/18/wwtws-top-ten-movies-on-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23749</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Marlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5334#comment-23749</guid>
		<description>Zombieland was my fav film of the year.  Flawless in what it set out to do.  Glad to see it in your list CT, but surprised it isn&#039;t making most others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zombieland was my fav film of the year.  Flawless in what it set out to do.  Glad to see it in your list CT, but surprised it isn&#8217;t making most others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulM72</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2009/12/18/wwtws-top-ten-movies-on-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23746</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulM72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5334#comment-23746</guid>
		<description>Have to disagree with &quot;Avatar&quot;..I was bored about 45 minutes into it having figured out the whole story and the 3D, while impressive, got tiresome.

I&#039;m sure somewhere Howard Zinn is smiling to himself at this bit of backrubbing revisionist history wrapped up as a sci-fi adventure.  Cameron got VERY lazy (right up there with Lucas, Spielberg, and Zemeckis)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to disagree with &#8220;Avatar&#8221;..I was bored about 45 minutes into it having figured out the whole story and the 3D, while impressive, got tiresome.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure somewhere Howard Zinn is smiling to himself at this bit of backrubbing revisionist history wrapped up as a sci-fi adventure.  Cameron got VERY lazy (right up there with Lucas, Spielberg, and Zemeckis)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cftoto</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2009/12/18/wwtws-top-ten-movies-on-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23745</link>
		<dc:creator>cftoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5334#comment-23745</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a huge problem, James ... most folks can&#039;t see many of the movies up for Oscar noms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a huge problem, James &#8230; most folks can&#8217;t see many of the movies up for Oscar noms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Frazier</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2009/12/18/wwtws-top-ten-movies-on-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23744</link>
		<dc:creator>James Frazier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5334#comment-23744</guid>
		<description>Excellent list. Unfortunately, 1, 2, and 4 haven&#039;t made it to my neck of the woods just yet. I&#039;m gonna be paying a visit to LA next month and I hope to get them all seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent list. Unfortunately, 1, 2, and 4 haven&#8217;t made it to my neck of the woods just yet. I&#8217;m gonna be paying a visit to LA next month and I hope to get them all seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cftoto</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2009/12/18/wwtws-top-ten-movies-on-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23741</link>
		<dc:creator>cftoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5334#comment-23741</guid>
		<description>Making the list was a chore ... just very few excellent movies this year. And I had to resist the impulse to follow my peers and only pick movies that had that &quot;Oscar&quot; feel. It&#039;s a trap too many critics stumble into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making the list was a chore &#8230; just very few excellent movies this year. And I had to resist the impulse to follow my peers and only pick movies that had that &#8220;Oscar&#8221; feel. It&#8217;s a trap too many critics stumble into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gory</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2009/12/18/wwtws-top-ten-movies-on-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23740</link>
		<dc:creator>Gory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5334#comment-23740</guid>
		<description>Good list. Now I&#039;m even more intrigued to see Precious. 

Glad Paranormal Activity made your list. And I am ashamed I missed Zombieland in the theatres.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good list. Now I&#8217;m even more intrigued to see Precious. </p>
<p>Glad Paranormal Activity made your list. And I am ashamed I missed Zombieland in the theatres.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

