<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Signs of optimism for 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/03/signs-of-optimism-for-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/03/signs-of-optimism-for-2010/</link>
	<description>Movie reviews from award-winning journalist Christian Toto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dagnabbitt</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/03/signs-of-optimism-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-23958</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagnabbitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5507#comment-23958</guid>
		<description>Mediocre (which only means &quot;average,&quot; after all) story line notwithstanding, I also applaud Cameron not only for attempting (and wildly succeeding!) something original in a milieu that appears to fear the very concept, but also for presenting something worth spending $10+ to see on the big screen - much as he did with &quot;Titanic.&quot;  

As Toto has blogged before, technological advances in home theatre coupled with Hollywood mediocrity multiplied by ever-more expensive movie nights equals little incentive to go the movies - once a long-standing American tradition.

~ D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mediocre (which only means &#8220;average,&#8221; after all) story line notwithstanding, I also applaud Cameron not only for attempting (and wildly succeeding!) something original in a milieu that appears to fear the very concept, but also for presenting something worth spending $10+ to see on the big screen &#8211; much as he did with &#8220;Titanic.&#8221;  </p>
<p>As Toto has blogged before, technological advances in home theatre coupled with Hollywood mediocrity multiplied by ever-more expensive movie nights equals little incentive to go the movies &#8211; once a long-standing American tradition.</p>
<p>~ D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/03/signs-of-optimism-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-23943</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5507#comment-23943</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Isn’t that what we want to see, an artist’s vision brought to life without compromise?&lt;/em&gt;

I guess this falls into the &quot;be careful what you wish for&quot; catagory.  We get a new original movie franchise and it&#039;s anti-American anti-technology pro-tree hugger primativist dreck. And popular enough that it will spawn endless sequels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Isn’t that what we want to see, an artist’s vision brought to life without compromise?</em></p>
<p>I guess this falls into the &#8220;be careful what you wish for&#8221; catagory.  We get a new original movie franchise and it&#8217;s anti-American anti-technology pro-tree hugger primativist dreck. And popular enough that it will spawn endless sequels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

