<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When ideology strikes!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/08/when-ideology-strikes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/08/when-ideology-strikes/</link>
	<description>Movie reviews from award-winning journalist Christian Toto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don Sucher</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/08/when-ideology-strikes/comment-page-1/#comment-24015</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Sucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5543#comment-24015</guid>
		<description>Growth and evolution of film technology is itself a thrilling thing but in the end the story is what counts.  This has become more and more clear to me now that a good home theater (with a large projection screen) makes it possible to really view what I want when I want.

Thus &quot;Pearl Harbor&quot; sits on the shelf despite fantastic CGI while &quot;From Here to Eternity&quot; gets repeated viewings. Indeed, I find I turning more and more to the old, all done in the studio, moderate budget, b/w classics despite their monaural soundtracks and obvious rear-screen projections and glass shots.

Avatar&#039;s box office success certainly justifies its making to the business people involved, but I personally will likely hold back form seeing the &quot;new&quot; 3D technology until something that is more than eye candy becomes available.

And not supporting a film with a nasty anti-west, phony-baloney eco theme, seconds that decision in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Growth and evolution of film technology is itself a thrilling thing but in the end the story is what counts.  This has become more and more clear to me now that a good home theater (with a large projection screen) makes it possible to really view what I want when I want.</p>
<p>Thus &#8220;Pearl Harbor&#8221; sits on the shelf despite fantastic CGI while &#8220;From Here to Eternity&#8221; gets repeated viewings. Indeed, I find I turning more and more to the old, all done in the studio, moderate budget, b/w classics despite their monaural soundtracks and obvious rear-screen projections and glass shots.</p>
<p>Avatar&#8217;s box office success certainly justifies its making to the business people involved, but I personally will likely hold back form seeing the &#8220;new&#8221; 3D technology until something that is more than eye candy becomes available.</p>
<p>And not supporting a film with a nasty anti-west, phony-baloney eco theme, seconds that decision in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jic</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/08/when-ideology-strikes/comment-page-1/#comment-24002</link>
		<dc:creator>jic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 04:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5543#comment-24002</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The Flynn Comments&lt;/i&gt; was a short-lived spin-off of &lt;i&gt;The Rockford Files&lt;/i&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Flynn Comments</i> was a short-lived spin-off of <i>The Rockford Files</i>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jic</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/08/when-ideology-strikes/comment-page-1/#comment-24001</link>
		<dc:creator>jic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 04:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5543#comment-24001</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://bitsblog.florack.us/?p=7925&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here are the Flynn comments:&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Q: This year has seen a surge of antiwar films, which are flopping like dominoes, while “Protect and Defend” is the No. 1 book this week. Is Hollywood ready for Mitch Rapp yet?&lt;/b&gt;
A: I don’t think we are quite there. Hollywood is now saying people don’t want to watch movies about war. No, Americans don’t want to watch [bad] anti-American movies about war. Americans would love to watch a great movie where Mitch Rapp is meting out punishment to these crazy zealots, but I don’t know if Hollywood has the guts to do it. If Democrats take the White House, Hollywood will make a movie like that in a heartbeat.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bitsblog.florack.us/?p=7925" rel="nofollow">Here are the Flynn comments:</a></p>
<blockquote><p><i><b>Q: This year has seen a surge of antiwar films, which are flopping like dominoes, while “Protect and Defend” is the No. 1 book this week. Is Hollywood ready for Mitch Rapp yet?</b><br />
A: I don’t think we are quite there. Hollywood is now saying people don’t want to watch movies about war. No, Americans don’t want to watch [bad] anti-American movies about war. Americans would love to watch a great movie where Mitch Rapp is meting out punishment to these crazy zealots, but I don’t know if Hollywood has the guts to do it. If Democrats take the White House, Hollywood will make a movie like that in a heartbeat.</i></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/08/when-ideology-strikes/comment-page-1/#comment-24000</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5543#comment-24000</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;He states several producers all wanted to, but they had to wait until Bush was out of office!&lt;/em&gt;

I haven&#039;t heard of anything like a right wing oriented movie coming down the production gut. As near as I can tell &quot;Atlas Shrugged&quot; is still stalled in production with no end in sight. 

It strikes me that it&#039;s quite possible that the Hollywood left may prefer being in total control of the greatest propaganda machine the world has ever seen. The success of AVATAR implies that you don&#039;t need to make movies that conservatives would go to, because Hollywood now makes more of it&#039;s money overseas than at home and anti-Americanism makes more money there than Mom and apple pie does here.  

Add to that the problems with Obamism and the possible resurgence of the Republicans, and there must be a terrific temptation to keep the Hollywood ministry of truth&#039;s novel writing machines working round the clock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>He states several producers all wanted to, but they had to wait until Bush was out of office!</em></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t heard of anything like a right wing oriented movie coming down the production gut. As near as I can tell &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; is still stalled in production with no end in sight. </p>
<p>It strikes me that it&#8217;s quite possible that the Hollywood left may prefer being in total control of the greatest propaganda machine the world has ever seen. The success of AVATAR implies that you don&#8217;t need to make movies that conservatives would go to, because Hollywood now makes more of it&#8217;s money overseas than at home and anti-Americanism makes more money there than Mom and apple pie does here.  </p>
<p>Add to that the problems with Obamism and the possible resurgence of the Republicans, and there must be a terrific temptation to keep the Hollywood ministry of truth&#8217;s novel writing machines working round the clock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cftoto</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/08/when-ideology-strikes/comment-page-1/#comment-23998</link>
		<dc:creator>cftoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5543#comment-23998</guid>
		<description>Mark ... do you have links to those items re: Flynn&#039;s books and the Bush comments? Will post them here if you do... thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8230; do you have links to those items re: Flynn&#8217;s books and the Bush comments? Will post them here if you do&#8230; thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/08/when-ideology-strikes/comment-page-1/#comment-23997</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5543#comment-23997</guid>
		<description>Agreed, Toto.
Just think if they all tried to tell good stories.  I remember hearing Vince Flynn on an interview about why they haven&#039;t made any movies about his books.  He states several producers all wanted to, but they had to wait until Bush was out of office!  Unreal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Toto.<br />
Just think if they all tried to tell good stories.  I remember hearing Vince Flynn on an interview about why they haven&#8217;t made any movies about his books.  He states several producers all wanted to, but they had to wait until Bush was out of office!  Unreal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

