<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cameron hearts ecoterrorism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/</link>
	<description>Movie reviews from award-winning journalist Christian Toto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 05:39:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam18</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-37694</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5646#comment-37694</guid>
		<description>Lol, yeah James Cameron. You create a stupid movie (which was just a remake of Disney&#039;s Pocahontas) to promote anti-corporate. And you let your movie get produced by News Corporation - the same company that owns Fox News. 

This why liberal wack-tivists like Cameron can&#039;t be taken seriously - kind of like the OWS protestors who want to &quot;stomp out capitalism&quot; but rely on corporate-owned websites like Twitter and Youtube to &quot;spread their revolution&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, yeah James Cameron. You create a stupid movie (which was just a remake of Disney&#8217;s Pocahontas) to promote anti-corporate. And you let your movie get produced by News Corporation &#8211; the same company that owns Fox News. </p>
<p>This why liberal wack-tivists like Cameron can&#8217;t be taken seriously &#8211; kind of like the OWS protestors who want to &#8220;stomp out capitalism&#8221; but rely on corporate-owned websites like Twitter and Youtube to &#8220;spread their revolution&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eco-Terror &#171; LIBERTY VIEW</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-29577</link>
		<dc:creator>Eco-Terror &#171; LIBERTY VIEW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5646#comment-29577</guid>
		<description>[...] far above his opponents status. Well he has claimed that he believes in eco-terror. Really, see it here. How about that? He is pleased that Avatar is the perfect eco-terrorist recruiting tool. That [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] far above his opponents status. Well he has claimed that he believes in eco-terror. Really, see it here. How about that? He is pleased that Avatar is the perfect eco-terrorist recruiting tool. That [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EWTHeckman</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-24149</link>
		<dc:creator>EWTHeckman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5646#comment-24149</guid>
		<description>I scanned the issue&#039;s cover and the page where the quote appears and put them together &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greatestpursuits.us/ew/EW-James-Cameron-Pull-Quote.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Note that I deliberately blurred the rest of the text to avoid infringing on EW&#039;s copyright.

These two columns are &quot;some of the best and worst things&quot; said about Avatar. The portions in blue are what was written, and the portions in black are Cameron&#039;s responses. Note that Cameron&#039;s ecoterrorism quote is the complete statement given from the review and Cameron&#039;s complete response given for that statement. The previous quote and response is about Popular Science&#039;s review pointing out the irony of Cameron using cutting edge technology to push a Luddite belief system. The quote after it is about someone who got pissed off about the message of the movie. Interestingly enough, it does start with &quot;&lt;b&gt;JC:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;[Laughing]&lt;/i&gt;&quot;, which is notably absent from the quote in question.

Finally, the facing page has the following pull quote on it:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;It&#039;s not an Oliver Stone-style bludgeon-you-over-the-head political film, but it does have a political subtext. I am a tree hugger.&quot;
—James Cameron&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I scanned the issue&#8217;s cover and the page where the quote appears and put them together <a href="http://www.greatestpursuits.us/ew/EW-James-Cameron-Pull-Quote.jpg" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Note that I deliberately blurred the rest of the text to avoid infringing on EW&#8217;s copyright.</p>
<p>These two columns are &#8220;some of the best and worst things&#8221; said about Avatar. The portions in blue are what was written, and the portions in black are Cameron&#8217;s responses. Note that Cameron&#8217;s ecoterrorism quote is the complete statement given from the review and Cameron&#8217;s complete response given for that statement. The previous quote and response is about Popular Science&#8217;s review pointing out the irony of Cameron using cutting edge technology to push a Luddite belief system. The quote after it is about someone who got pissed off about the message of the movie. Interestingly enough, it does start with &#8220;<b>JC:</b> <i>[Laughing]</i>&#8220;, which is notably absent from the quote in question.</p>
<p>Finally, the facing page has the following pull quote on it:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not an Oliver Stone-style bludgeon-you-over-the-head political film, but it does have a political subtext. I am a tree hugger.&#8221;<br />
—James Cameron</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Modest Proposal</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-24133</link>
		<dc:creator>A Modest Proposal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5646#comment-24133</guid>
		<description>Okaaayyy...   while it can&#039;t be ruled out that Cameron supports ecoterrorism, what hasn&#039;t been mentioned is the far more likely idea of responding to an absurd charge with an absurd answer.   

Avatar does represent an obvious challenge to exploitation-driven imperialism, and good for Cameron in successfully getting this important (if heavy-handed in the execution) message to resonate in mainstream America.  Only a slavering corporatist tool could be so offended by such a challenge to the corruption underlying our traditional economic methods that he&#039;d go so far as to declare this movie a recruitment tool for ecoterrorism.   

As a sometime environmental activist, I hear all the time from the uninformed and propagandized that my REAL motives are to confiscate all the guns, destroy capitalism, &amp; set up sodomy camps so that Jesus will cry.   So, sometimes I agree with them, just to set them off.   I think it&#039;s far more likely that&#039;s what Cameron&#039;s doing here, and that you may have taken the wingnut bait.

Consider it over your morning coffee and baby bacon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okaaayyy&#8230;   while it can&#8217;t be ruled out that Cameron supports ecoterrorism, what hasn&#8217;t been mentioned is the far more likely idea of responding to an absurd charge with an absurd answer.   </p>
<p>Avatar does represent an obvious challenge to exploitation-driven imperialism, and good for Cameron in successfully getting this important (if heavy-handed in the execution) message to resonate in mainstream America.  Only a slavering corporatist tool could be so offended by such a challenge to the corruption underlying our traditional economic methods that he&#8217;d go so far as to declare this movie a recruitment tool for ecoterrorism.   </p>
<p>As a sometime environmental activist, I hear all the time from the uninformed and propagandized that my REAL motives are to confiscate all the guns, destroy capitalism, &amp; set up sodomy camps so that Jesus will cry.   So, sometimes I agree with them, just to set them off.   I think it&#8217;s far more likely that&#8217;s what Cameron&#8217;s doing here, and that you may have taken the wingnut bait.</p>
<p>Consider it over your morning coffee and baby bacon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NB</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-24125</link>
		<dc:creator>NB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5646#comment-24125</guid>
		<description>Can you at least post a scan of the EW page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you at least post a scan of the EW page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TKoch</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-24099</link>
		<dc:creator>TKoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5646#comment-24099</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the carbon footprint of this movie was.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the carbon footprint of this movie was&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulM72</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-24098</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulM72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5646#comment-24098</guid>
		<description>Funny how it&#039;s the &quot;right wing blogosphere&quot; that&#039;s blowing up while the left-wing blogosphere are polishing Cameron&#039;s hypocritical knob.  Hope they are proud of themselves to be such fools.

Got to love the plastic Na&#039;vi toys reference....real eco friendly there James.  How about all the gas your limos/SUV&#039;s/private jets waste?  Man...it&#039;s sad how complete morons can gain millions off the backs of more morons (and yes, you&#039;re a moron if you thought Avatar was a great movie...complete and utter moron).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how it&#8217;s the &#8220;right wing blogosphere&#8221; that&#8217;s blowing up while the left-wing blogosphere are polishing Cameron&#8217;s hypocritical knob.  Hope they are proud of themselves to be such fools.</p>
<p>Got to love the plastic Na&#8217;vi toys reference&#8230;.real eco friendly there James.  How about all the gas your limos/SUV&#8217;s/private jets waste?  Man&#8230;it&#8217;s sad how complete morons can gain millions off the backs of more morons (and yes, you&#8217;re a moron if you thought Avatar was a great movie&#8230;complete and utter moron).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-24094</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5646#comment-24094</guid>
		<description>I wonder how much energy that hypocrites house uses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much energy that hypocrites house uses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadyal</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-24093</link>
		<dc:creator>shadyal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5646#comment-24093</guid>
		<description>let&#039;s see, a totally self absorbed super rich individual making commentary about issues that affects who knows how many common folk.

from Hollywood....imagine that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let&#8217;s see, a totally self absorbed super rich individual making commentary about issues that affects who knows how many common folk.</p>
<p>from Hollywood&#8230;.imagine that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2010/01/16/cameron-hearts-eco-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-24089</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/?p=5646#comment-24089</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the thoughtful reply.  That&#039;s not sarcasm.  But, considering how those two lines are burning up the right-wing blogosphere, do you think you could type up the preceding three or four lines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thoughtful reply.  That&#8217;s not sarcasm.  But, considering how those two lines are burning up the right-wing blogosphere, do you think you could type up the preceding three or four lines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
