‘The Wolfman’ – Where did we put that silver bullet again?

‘The Wolfman’ – Where did we put that silver bullet again?

The wolfman benicio del toro

For a few, blissful moments, “The Wolfman” makes us believe the minds behind the film were faithful to what made the iconic monster franchise tick.

We’re treated to shots of an English country side dusted with ash, talk of strange curses and, best of all, the sight of Benicio del Toro howling at the moon.

The actor’s hangdog expression captures the haunted look Lon Chaney, Jr. brought to his Wolf Man portrayals.

Then, the script reveals itself to be 21st century stupid and the plot gives way to a series of violent but empty action sequences.

Suddenly, we wish this wolf would have stayed retired.

Del Toro stars as Lawrence Talbot, a British-born actor who returns home from a lengthy stay in America when his brother is reported missing.

That explains Lawrence’s wavering accent but not the comatose performance. More on that later.

His father (Anthony Hopkins) is glad to see “the prodigal son” return – a line he uses twice – but he tells Lawrence his brother’s body has been found.

It seems a deranged man has been ravaging their village, leaving death and destruction in his wake. Naturally, we know it’s not a man but a curse-delivering wolf doing the damage. And it isn’t finished with the Talbot boys quite yet.

“The Wolfman” delivers a nice blend of CGI and old school makeup, and this version of the half man, half beast creature is particularly vicious. More than a few heads get lopped off before the final credits roll.

Rick Baker, who concocted the astounding effects in “An American Werewolf” in London, applies the faux fur to del Toro, and there’s not a thing wrong with his makeup wizardry.

The gore, too, is plentiful, which feels odd coming from an old school monster but it helps get our attention – at first.

Del Toro, so physically right for the part, is cursed by a terrible script that can’t let us get emotionally involved in his character’s fate. But he deserves part of the blame for dull line readings and the sense he’d rather be anywhere else but on the set of a monster movie.

The Wolf Man archetype represents a compelling duality. He’s a monster who must be stopped, but we mourn for the lost soul caught up in the curse.

This Lawrence Talbot barely has a soul worth saving, and the love story element is treated superficially. Emily Blunt attempts to bring a spark to the film as the fiance of Talbot’s brother. She and del Toro even share a kiss mid film, one that comes on unexpectedly and doesn’t leave a mark.

Hopkins gives one of his worst performances to date. We’re never quite sure what to think of his character, and he can’t make a critical final act twist pay off in a meaningful way.

Even Hugo Weaving, a terrific character actor, isn’t challenged by a story that can’t channel his screen presence properly.

Some of the early action sequences are quite thrilling, but without getting emotionally involved in Lawrence’s fate they quickly lose their appeal.

“The Wolfman” grounds up classic elements from the Universal vault – the silver bullet, the mysterious gypsies, characters leafing through Lycanthropy 101 – but the results are a thoroughly modern misfire.


(Photo: An English village is beset by a marauding creature in “The Wolfman.”/Universal Pictures)

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Related posts:

  1. ‘Hellboy II’ – Better Red than dead
  2. WWTW Rewind – ‘Ong-Bak: The Thai Warrior (2003)
  3. WWTW Rewind: ‘An American Werewolf in London’ (1981)

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

GrofeNo Gravatar February 12, 2010 at 6:47 pm

Crap. Even after reading about the delays and the re-writes I was hoping this would be good. Rick Baker is the man – but if the script is bad… Up next, The Crazies. Crossing my fingers.

cftotoNo Gravatar February 12, 2010 at 7:42 pm

I’m cautiously optimistic on The Crazies … the trailer rocks. I’ll likely be interviewing some folks from that film … so stay tuned.

NehmerNo Gravatar February 14, 2010 at 4:53 am

Werewolfs? I thought it was an overdue bio pic of Wolfman Jack.

CyberschizoidNo Gravatar February 15, 2010 at 10:36 am

You’ve got it spot on. A very disappointing remake, just like most of today’s bland Hollywood remakes.
It’s a shame that there does not seem to be a spark of originality left in these big budget travesties. An interesting concept would be to come up with an original story and film that instead, for at least a tenth of the budget.

AkJNo Gravatar February 16, 2010 at 11:51 pm

I nodded off twice and looked at my seat mates to see if they were still watching. During an afterward drink I asked one what she thought. “If it wasn’t so-and-so’s birthday celebration night I would have walked out after the first hour.” I still can’t believe three well known and great actors (Toro, Weaving, Hopkins) actually agreed to be part of this.

Leave a Comment