‘Repo Men’ – All gimmick, no payoff

‘Repo Men’ – All gimmick, no payoff

Great science fiction films typically start with a gimmick, a concept that could only happen in an alternate reality.

The replicants in “Blade Runner.” The prawn-like immigrants invading South Africa in “District 9.”

“Repo Men” boasts such a hook, and then some.

We’ll forgive the fact that it’s recycling a key theme from “Repo!: The Genetic Opera.”

Imagine a future in which artificial organs can take the place of a failing liver, heart or kidney.

Of course, there’s a price to progress – there always is. If you can’t pay for your new organ they’ll repossess it right out of your body.

But “Repo Men” does virtually nothing with its can’t-miss premise – unless you consider unrelenting gore and utterly irredeemable characters a savings grace.

Jude Law and Forest Whitaker co-star as the titular “Repo Men,” longtime pals whose day job entails retrieving artificial organs of patients who can’t keep up with their payment plan.

That means surprising them on the street, at work or at home and slicing and dicing their quivering bodies in order to retrieve the merchandise.

Remy (Law, buffer but still a lithe presence) loves his work, which is odd since he’s essentially killing people for a paycheck.

Right away we find it all but impossible to relate to Remy, even if he gets his bromance on with Jake (Whitaker), his partner in killing.

They slice and dice sans remorse, and we’re supposed to feel badly when Remy’s distant wife threatens to leave him because his gig isn’t 9-to-5 enough for family life.

Poor baby.

Remy decides to work on the sales side of artificial organs to appease her, but a work accident sends him to the hospital.

He wakes up with a new, artificial heart, courtesy of his own company. He also has a fresh outlook on his livelihood along with a hefty new payment plan.

“Repo Men’s” social commentary starts and ends with the organs. Sure, we get the greedy capitalistic company which doesn’t give a darn about slaughtering patients who can’t pony up.

Audiences likely won’t blink an eye at such a corporate slam at this point.

The film lacks characters to rally around and can’t deliver a second layer of social commentary. The sharply realized cityscapes are a wonder to behold, but the action soon focuses on the characters and storyline, a decided disadvantage here.

“Repo Men” doesn’t make a lick of sense, even by sci-fi standards, and it ends with a by-now familiar twist ending.

The finale feels more coherent than “Shutter Island’s” gotcha moment. It still can’t cover up the film’s inability to carry though on its bold science fiction premise.

(Photo: “Repo Men” casts Jude Law and Forest Whitaker as men who rip out artificial organs from patients who can’t pay their medical bills/Universal Pictures)

Note: You can follow What Would Toto Watch? on Twitter.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Related posts:

  1. ‘Yes Man’ – Carrey can’t say no to gimmick comedy
  2. Blu-ray Review: ‘The Last King of Scotland’
  3. ‘Crank: High Voltage’ – Battery up
  4. ‘The Dukes’ – Doo wop dramatics

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

AkJNo Gravatar March 19, 2010 at 10:02 pm

I was hoping for some really dark and twisted ending to justify the lack of strong characters. That isn’t what I call a surprise ending. I wasn’t thinking that I was robbed of 2 hours of my time, unlike Terminator Salvation, but Sci Fi producers can do much better than this. CGI, blood and guts takes center stage again. Not the story or dialogue. Bummer.

KNo Gravatar March 20, 2010 at 7:18 am

Sure, we get the greedy capitalistic company

A similar premise to Robocop. Greedy company taking away a cop’s limbs so that they can turn him into a crime fighting robot. That movie took place in Detroit and in that dysfunctional hellish movie future, even the police had been privatized by the corporation that ran the city.

Well, the greedy capitalists never did take over Detroit, it remained in the hands of the government. Which is why it’s such a garden spot today.

DagnabbittNo Gravatar March 23, 2010 at 5:32 pm

Disappointing execution, indeed. A worthy follow-up blog entry is the post-Academy Award selections that winners make: Whitaker is not Michael Caine (who himself no longer is Michael Caine) to have to take the paycheck regardless of the film.

D.

HeidiNo Gravatar March 23, 2010 at 10:30 pm

So glad we skipped this and ended up sleeping through Polanski’s new film. Well, not sleeping, but yawning, definitely yawning.

cftotoNo Gravatar March 23, 2010 at 10:48 pm

Methinks the critics were a mite too eager to heap praise on ‘The Ghost Writer.” It’s not a dud, and it’s extremely well crafted. But Polanksi’s creative peak is long behind him …

Leave a Comment