Director Andrew Jarecki ignored conventional wisdom while making his first narrative feature, the fact-based drama “All Good Things.”
Jarecki spent a full year conducting interviews with many of the players behind the true story of real estate scion Robert Durst and his missing wife, Kathie.
“You don’t have to do this, they said,” Jarecki recalls of the reaction to his intensive approach. “If you want to make a movie in Hollywood, find an article in a magazine [about the subject], buy the rights to it and make your story based on the article. Audiences won’t know the difference.”
Jarecki, best known for his celebrated documentary “Capturing the Friedmans,” couldn’t take such a short cut – even if he wanted to do so.
The existing material on the case didn‘t tell him the full story. “Most of the stuff out there was awful, lousy journalism,” he says. Besides, he adds, audiences do the know the difference when they’re watching a movie based on actual events.
“They’re sensitive to the details of real life,” he says.
So he ended up taping the interviews he conducted and sharing them with the film’s stars, Ryan Gosling and Kirsten Dunst.
“All Good Things,” now playing in select cities and via Video on Demand services, follows the decaying marriage of David and Katie Marks (Gosling and Dunst). The pair meet cute and go on to start their own health food store in Vermont. But when David’s wealthy father (Frank Langella) convinces David to join the family business, the move puts a strain on the couple’s relationship. When Katie disappears years later without a proverbial trace, viewers may finger her husband as the culprit.
Was it murder? “All Good Things” isn’t telling.
The Durst story seems ripe for the documentary format, but Jarecki thought it would be best served in narrative form.
“A lot of the story is unknown. It’s interesting to have actors explore that,” he says. The film changes the names of the key characters but otherwise hews closely to the real Durst case.
“There’s a natural desire for me to try to get the story as close to real events as possible,” he says. “Those events tend to speak volumes. Real life is so fascinating.”
Consider the moment in the film when David’s millionaire father tells Katie’s mother, a humble woman with little resources, to pick up her half of a restaurant check. That detail came from the director’s copious interviews and tells the audience a great deal about Langella’s character.
Jarecki applauds Gosling’s ability to convincingly age on screen through the movie via a combination of acting tricks and makeup. But he’s enthused about audiences seeing Dunst in a way they haven’t before.
“She’s been working [as an actress] since she was 9 years old. She’s been able to reinvent herself in a lot of different ways,” he says of the film’s lovely co-star who hasn’t had a role of consequence since 2007’s “Spider-Man 3″ and has battled depression.
He credits her for the success of the 2002 “Spider-Man” feature, describing her as the “heart of the movie.”
Dunst was able to bring something to his new film that he didn’t anticipate.
“When she read the script [for ‘All Good Things’] she immediately said, ‘I’m in.‘ Usually, there‘s a lot of equivocation with actors,” he says. “She‘s a more intuitive responder. She has that in common with the real Kathie Durst.”
Jarecki isn’t the only documentary director in his family. Brother Eugene is responsible for “Why We Fight” as well as one of the segments in the recently released film “Freakonomics.“ Andrew Jarecki says the family background provided a unique crucible for two emerging artists. Their father was a “methodical, hard working German,” he says, and their mother reviewed movies for Time Magazine.
But family friend Melvin Van Peebles, the renaissance man behind “Watermelon Man” and “Sweet Sweetback’s Baadassss Song,” also impacted the brothers.
“He pushed us a lot to have a more artistic life,” he says. “My father pushed us to have a more concrete life. Both influences were important. It‘s hard to be a filmmaker now.”
The brothers spent time working under their father and picked up his tenacity and hustle.
“It put us in a better position to understand how to get a movie made. It’s not as simple as having a great idea. It’s overcoming the incredible number of bowling pins thrown at your head while making it,” he says. “Eugene and I have this pragmatic side. We get our teeth into something and we don’t let go until its finished.”
(Photo: Top, right: Filmmaker Andrew Jarecki. Bottom, left: Ryan Gosling plays a distraught married man in “All Good Things.” Magnolia Pictures)
Related posts:



{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
“Awful lousy journalism” compared to an awful, lousy movie?
Jarecki should have picked up one of those magazine pieces. At the least it would have infused some life into this mess of a film. Better yet, he should have based it on Matt Birkbeck’s book “A Deadly Secret,” which completely covered the story.
Dear Carol ‘D’…[perhaps the D is in support of Durst?!],
The following is in support of Andrew Jarecki and Kirsten Dunst [who spent numerous hours developing an understanding of the character and substance of my sister Kathie (McCormack) Durst]. I have offered this comment on numerous reviewer websites so that truth does not get altered by the very media sources you cite above.
“My name is Jim McCormack. I am Kathie Durst’s older brother.
In 1971 Kathie (then an innocent 19) met Bob Durst who was allegedly working for his father Seymour at the Durst Organization. Kathie was swept off her feet (literally) by Bob as he appeared to be her ‘Prince Charming’ while she was his ‘Cinderella’. Sadly those early days of mutual love and infatuation gave way to the TRUTH not just of Bob but of the organization.
Kathie had a giving and nurturing heart most evident in her quest to first be Bob’s wife (married April 12, 1973) and thereafter, to become a nurse (graduated 1978) followed by her dream of being a doctor (on course to graduate Spring 1982). That same heart kept trying to reach out to Bob and offer him solace and support in dealing with the personality challenges & behaviors he exhibited.
When Kathie first went ‘missing’ January 31, 1982, our family was in shock dealing with the enormous pain & suffering over Kathie’s loss. Our efforts to determine how/why Kathie ‘disappeared’ were NEVER proactively supported by anyone at the Durst organization nor any outreach by any member of that family. How could a father-in-law (nor his children) be so cold to the family of the daughter-in-law??!! Not even an outreach to the Mother of the ‘missing’ daughter!
We are now on the cusp of seeing a movie, “All Good Things”, inspired by the relationship of Kathie & Bob. The movie includes true anecdotes of the relationships and goings-on of their extended families. To think the Durst Organization would even consider a legal threat to the TRUTH of that era as portrayed in the movie is beyond arrogance. Creative license aside, truth is being challenged.
However, much good will come from those whose denial of TRUTH has kept my family from closure & justice if they simply accept their own epiphany of conscience. That alone will heal many lingering wounds and an appropriate memorial to Kathie’s memory & aspirations can finally occur.
The following. from Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice 1596, is prophetic:
LAUNCELOT:
“Nay, indeed, if you had your eyes, you might fail of
the knowing me: it is a wise father that knows his
own child. Well, old man, I will tell you news of
your son: give me your blessing: truth will come
to light; murder cannot be hid long; a man’s son
may, but at the length truth will out.”
God Bless You Kathie!
I’ll never give up.
“Truth Will Out!”
Your Brother Jim”
Mr. McCormack,
I’m sorry for your loss. I’m a fan of Matt Birkbeck’s book A Beautiful Child and wanted to read something else he wrote so I read the book on your sister’s case several months ago which piqued my interest in the film. My criticism is simply based on the movie which just wasn’t good. They never explain in the film what was really wrong with Durst. I hope you find peace.
Carol D, (pardon my spelling below)
Thanks for your sensitive reply to my post. While I can respect your right to a movie comment, I don’t agree with it. Best you see the movie several times (yes ’several’) and I believe your opinion will change.
Please understand that for 28(+) years we have lived in a state of despair over Kathie’sdisappearance & a loss of faith in our so called ‘justice system’. That Kathie’s love for Bob was ignored by him as he pursued his own agendas, including his ‘independence’ from the family real estate business, speaks loudly of his narcissistic (sic) and sociopathic personalitiy. What transpired between them was an ever increasing series of abuses by Bob that Kathie (sadly) kept to herself. First, because she sincerely felt she could help Bob and ultimately because she felt her own pain & suffering was due a modest settlement as she pursued a divorce.
[NB - I have a copy of Kathie's notes to her divorce counselor, so my comments are not just conjecture but FACTS.]
The essense of the movie does bring Kathie’s story to the fore while the books and various tv media shows focused mostly upon Bob. Andrew Jarecki deserves much applause for trying to right that wrong. Kirsten Dunst was superb. I thanked her at the premiere and she sponaneously went to tears as we met…quite a lady with much to offer going forward.
Thank you,
Jim
Dear Jim-
I just watched this movie and cannot stop thinking about it. First and foremost, I am so sorry you lost your sister. And, I am more sorry that her husband, at this point, is living his life and got away with it. I cannot even imagine what this has ben like for you and your family.. From the movie perspective, she was a beautiful soul who had a heart that was just too big. Her disappearance has been so long…I must ask if you have ever tried a psychic? You are from NY, as am I, and Phil Jordan lives in upstate NY. He has successfully assisted in hundreds of missing person cases and works with the police department frequently. It is worth a try. Please feel free to E-mail me. I want to help. I know it is an unconventional way to find out what happened, but if that guy can admit to doing what he did to his friend nd only serves 9 months, he’s going to get away with it all. I hope to hear from you. God bless, Danielle